The Hardest Part of Learning Python Isn't the Code
November 21, 2025
5
min read

I've been learning Python for a few weeks. I can write scripts that work. I've automated parts of my job. I understand loops, functions, and basic data structures.
But the code was never the hard part.
Every "learn to code" article focuses on syntax, tutorials, and which course to take. They make it sound like the challenge is understanding for loops and if statements.
That's not where I struggled.
The hard part is everything else. The stuff nobody warns you about. The psychological battle that happens before you write a single line of code.
Here's what actually makes learning Python difficult when you're not a developer.
The Frustration Tolerance Problem
This is the real barrier. Not intelligence. Not time. Frustration tolerance.
When you're learning to code, you will:
Spend 45 minutes on an error caused by a missing colon
Watch a tutorial, follow it exactly, and have it not work
Google an error message and find answers that assume knowledge you don't have
Feel stupid multiple times per session
Get something working and have no idea why
Most people quit here. Not because they can't learn Python. Because the frustration feels like evidence they're not meant for this.
It's not evidence of anything. It's just how learning to code works.
What helped me:
I started expecting frustration. When I sat down to code, I'd think: "At some point in the next hour, I will feel stupid and stuck. That's normal. That's part of this."
Reframing frustration as expected rather than a sign of failure changed everything.
The frustration didn't decrease. My tolerance for it increased.
The "How Do I Even Ask This?" Problem
Nobody teaches you how to ask AI for coding help.
When you're stuck, you ask Claude or ChatGPT. But how do you describe a problem you don't understand?
Example:
My script wasn't working. It ran without errors but produced wrong output.
What do I ask?
"Why isn't my code working?" → AI asks for code, you paste it, get a generic answer
"Fix this" → AI changes things but you don't learn why
"What's wrong?" → Too vague to get useful help
The actual problem: I was modifying a list inside a function and expecting it to not affect the original list. I didn't know this was about "mutability" and "pass by reference."
If you don't know the concept, you can't ask about it.
What helped me:
Describing the behavior, not the problem.
Instead of: "Why isn't this working?" Ask: "I pass a list to a function, the function changes it, but the original list outside the function also changes. Why?"
Instead of: "Fix my code" Ask: "Explain what this code does line by line and where it might produce unexpected behavior"
The better approach: Ask AI to explain what's happening, not just fix it. Otherwise you get working code you don't understand and make the same mistake next time.
But those first months of not even knowing how to ask the right question? Brutal.
The Tutorial Trap (And What Actually Works)
Passive tutorials feel productive. They usually aren't.
I watched hours of Python tutorials. I followed along. I felt like I was learning.
Then I closed the tutorial and tried to build something myself.
Blank screen. No idea where to start.
Passive tutorials teach you to follow instructions. They don't teach you to solve problems.
The gap between "I watched someone do this" and "I can do this myself" is enormous.
What helped me:
Gamified, interactive learning. Codecademy and Codefinity work for me because:
You write code, not just watch it
Immediate feedback (right or wrong, instantly)
Small wins keep you motivated
Streaks and progress tracking build consistency
The difference between passive tutorials and interactive courses is huge. One feels productive. The other actually is.
But courses alone aren't enough.
Even with good courses, I still needed to build real things. The course teaches concepts. Building teaches problem-solving.
My approach now:
Learn concept in Codecademy/Codefinity (structured, gamified)
Immediately try to apply it to a real problem I have
Get stuck → ask AI to explain (not just fix)
Repeat
Structured learning + real projects + AI assistance = actual progress.
None of these alone was enough. The combination works.
The "Am I Too Old/Late/Non-Technical?" Problem
The internal narrative is relentless.
When I started learning Python, my brain constantly reminded me:
"You're a marketer, not a developer"
"Real programmers started when they were 12"
"You're too old for this"
"Engineers will always be better, so why bother?"
This voice never fully goes away. Six months in, it's still there. It's just quieter now.
What helped me:
Defining what success actually means for me.
I'm not trying to become a software engineer. I'm not competing with developers. I'm trying to automate my own work and understand technical products better.
That's a different game.
I don't need to be good at Python compared to engineers. I need to be good enough at Python to solve my own problems.
That bar is much lower. And much more achievable.
The Isolation Problem
Learning to code alone is brutal.
No one to ask "dumb" questions. No one to check if your approach makes sense. No one to say "everyone struggles with this part."
AI can answer your questions. But it can't tell you "I felt the same way" or "that took me three weeks to understand too."
AI gives you answers. It doesn't give you encouragement.
What helped me:
Finding people at my level. Not experts. Peers.
Discord communities for beginners
Twitter/X accounts documenting their own learning
One friend who's also learning (not an expert, just someone figuring it out too)
AI can be your tutor. But you still need humans who make you feel less alone.
The expert (or AI) can answer your questions. The peer makes you feel normal for struggling.
Both matter. But when you're starting, the peer might matter more.
The Consistency Problem
Intensity doesn't work. Consistency does.
I tried:
Learning Python for 8 hours on a Saturday → burned out, didn't touch it for two weeks
"I'll learn when I have time" → never had time
Cramming before starting a project → forgot everything immediately
What finally worked:
30 minutes per day. Non-negotiable. Even when I wasn't in the mood.
Some days those 30 minutes were productive. Some days I just stared at code and made no progress.
But I showed up.
After a month of daily practice, things started sticking. Not because I suddenly got smarter. Because repetition compounds.
The people who learn to code aren't the smartest. They're the most consistent.
The "Nothing Works and I Don't Know Why" Problem
This is the loneliest moment in learning to code.
You've written what looks like correct code. No syntax errors. No error messages.
But it doesn't work. Or it works sometimes. Or it produces output that makes no sense.
And you have no idea why.
You can't Google an error message because there is no error message. You can't ask for help because you can't articulate the problem. You just know it's broken.
What helped me:
The debugging mindset.
Add print statements everywhere to see what's actually happening
Check assumptions (is this variable what I think it is?)
Isolate the problem (comment out code until you find what's breaking)
Explain the problem out loud (rubber duck debugging - it works)
Walk away and come back (fresh eyes catch obvious mistakes)
Debugging is a skill separate from coding. Nobody teaches it explicitly, but it's half the work.
The moment I started treating debugging as a skill to develop (not just an annoying obstacle), everything got easier.
The "I'm Not Building Anything Real" Problem
Tutorials have you build todo apps and calculators. This is demotivating.
I don't need a todo app. I don't care about calculators. Building things I don't need feels pointless.
What helped me:
Building things that solve my actual problems.
Script to pull data from an API I use for work
Automation for weekly reporting
Tool to format content for different platforms
When the outcome matters to you, the motivation to figure it out is higher.
I learned more building a real automation than I did in 20 hours of tutorials.
Find a real problem. Build a real solution. Learn along the way.
The Comparison Problem
You will see people on Twitter who learned Python in 3 months and got a dev job.
You will see people building amazing projects while you're still struggling with basic functions.
You will feel behind.
Here's what those posts don't show:
They were coding 8 hours a day (you have a full-time job)
They have a CS degree or prior programming experience
They're showing their wins, not their struggles
Their timeline is probably exaggerated
Their "3 months" doesn't count the years of adjacent experience
Comparison is pointless because you're not running the same race.
What helped me:
I stopped following "learn to code" accounts that made me feel behind.
I started following people who were honest about how hard it is.
Curate your feed for encouragement, not comparison.
The Perfectionism Problem
Your code will be ugly. Ship it anyway.
My first scripts were:
Repetitive (copy-pasted instead of using functions)
Inefficient (didn't know better approaches existed)
Poorly structured (no organization, just linear code)
Embarrassing (I'd never show an engineer)
But they worked. They solved my problems. They saved me time.
Ugly code that works > beautiful code that doesn't exist.
You can refactor later. You can learn better patterns. You can improve.
But first, you need something that works.
Give yourself permission to write bad code. That's how you eventually write good code.
The "When Will This Click?" Problem
You want a moment where everything makes sense.
That moment doesn't come.
There's no "aha!" where Python suddenly becomes easy. There's just a slow accumulation of things you understand, until one day you realize you're struggling less.
It's not a switch. It's a gradient.
What helped me:
Looking back at code I wrote a few weeks ago.
I couldn't believe how bad it was. How inefficient. How much I've learned since then.
That's the only measure of progress that matters. Not where you are compared to others. Where you are compared to where you started.
What I'd Tell Myself When I Started
If I could go back to day one, here's what I'd say:
1. The frustration is normal. Expect it. It's not a sign you're not meant for this.
2. Gamified courses actually work. Codecademy and Codefinity kept me consistent when motivation faded. But courses alone aren't enough - build real things too.
3. Ask AI to explain, not just fix. "Fix my code" gets you working code you don't understand. "Explain what's happening" gets you knowledge.
4. 30 minutes daily beats 8 hours weekly. Consistency compounds. Intensity burns out.
5. You don't need to be good. You need to be good enough. Good enough to solve your own problems is the goal.
6. Find peers, not just experts. Someone at your level makes you feel less alone.
7. Write ugly code. Ship it anyway. Working ugly code > perfect code that doesn't exist.
8. Stop comparing. Your journey is yours. Someone else's timeline is irrelevant.
9. It takes longer than you think. And that's okay. You're not behind.
The Truth About Learning Python
The code is the easy part.
Variables, loops, functions, classes - these are learnable. There are infinite resources. The syntax is documented.
The hard part is:
Tolerating frustration without quitting
Staying consistent when progress feels slow
Believing you can do this when your brain says you can't
Building real things when tutorials feel safer
Debugging when you don't know what's wrong
Continuing when comparison makes you want to stop
If you can manage the hard part, the code will come.
I'm only a few weeks in. I'm not a developer. I might never be.
But I can automate my work. I can understand technical products. I can build small tools that solve real problems.
That's enough. That's the whole point.
If you're learning Python and struggling, know this: The struggle isn't a sign you're failing. It's a sign you're learning.
Keep going.




